Guns: An “Obligation to Try” Harder.

“If there’s even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.”

– Barack Hussein Obama, 44th US President, Jan. 16, 2013

If saving “even one life” is more than simply political rhetoric or an expansion of government control, then perhaps the President and his supporters are setting their sights upon the wrong target: After all, in the United States the number of reported gun homicides are “roughly” comparable to the number of legal abortions…

Chart: Legal Abortions vs. Gun Homicides

…and by “roughly“, I mean “from 1976 to 2005 there’s been 100 legal abortions for every reported gun homicide in the United States“.

Imagine the public outcry from womens’ groups, people with a possible genetic defect, and especially Progressive Democrats and Civil Rights groups, if the emotions, hysteria, justifications, methods, and means they’re currently using to restrict the US Constitution’s 2nd Amendment were used by Conservatives, Republicans, and religious groups to restrict legal abortions. For example, it appears that while one gun homicide is worth about 100 abortion deaths, there are some who feel obligated to try and save only the one.

Now, before  womens’ groups, Progressive Democrats, and those having a possible genetic defect assault me with pot shots, let me admit that personally I have no problem with Supreme Court’s Roe vs. Wade decision of 1973: If abortions were completely illegal, it’s laws rigorously enforced, provided draconian punishment for lawbreakers, and included a high probability of personal injury or death, abortion deaths would still occur. The Supreme Court ruling of prudent national guidelines was a well-crafted compromise resulting from careful consideration of all aspects.

Sources:
- Gun Homicides:  “Homicide Trends in the United States“, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 07/01/2007
- Abortion Deaths: “Current U.S. Abortion Statistics“, as published by the USCCB.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Are You Kidding me?, History, Politics, Ramblings | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

People Shot at Hartford CT Gun Rally…

…with my fully-automatic, unlicensed, unconcealed digital camera.

And, if you’re curious to see how well I shot, then click here.

As for the headline…why can’t I be just as sensational and slightly misleading as some of the large media outlets?

Thanks for reading!

Posted in History, Media, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Meal Reveals Microsoft’s mis-Fortune.

The fortune cookie from another tasty meal at my local Chinese restaurant might reveal why Microsoft’s Bing search engine isn’t popular in China:

"bing" means "disease" in Chinese!

Perhaps Microsoft should tell China Bing is named after a crooner, cherries, a “Friend“, or curmudgeonly author

(BTW: My lotto luck with fortune cookie fortunes remains intact)

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Computers, I'm Laughing!, Ramblings, Technology | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CAPTCHA of the Day

Don’t know if this CAPTHA was by accident or intent…regardless, it’s implied irony still made me chuckle:

An interesting CAPTCHA word pair.

(Click image to enlarge)

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Computers, I'm Laughing!, Technology, The Economy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Shot at an Executive Order on Guns

Politico reports that in the wake of the horrific tragedy at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT the White House is preparing “19 executive actions on guns“. (Update: The final count was 23 Executive Orders)

Nineteen? Twenty three? Really?!? Well, I’m not a lawyer, politician, or lobbyist, but that sounds like a fairly large number to me – perhaps President Obama just wants to make sure at least one Executive Order will pass Constitutional scrutiny no matter how many of them he chooses to sign.

Still, it seems to me only one well-crafted Executive Order should suffice: And, after about 3 hrs of research, thoughtful reflection*, and careful editing I believe I’ve drafted one that just might do the trick. As an added bonus, my draft’s not only based on a past Executive Order that withstood the test of judicial scrutiny, but it can be applied to most of the “assault weapons” I wrote about in a recent post!

So, here’s my first draft, for your consideration:


The Gold Ammunition and High-Capacity Magazine Confiscation Of April 5, 1933 [TBD] January, 2013

From: President of the United States Franklin Delano Roosevelt Barack Hussein Obama
To: The United States Congress
Dated: 5 April, 1933 [TBD] January, 2013
Presidential Executive Order 6102 [TBD]

Forbidding the Hoarding of Gold coin, Gold bullion, and Gold certificates Ammuniton and High-capacity Magazines.

By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended by Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, entitled “An Act to provide relief in the existing national emergency in banking, and for other purposes”, in which amendatory Act Congress declared that a serious emergency exists,

I, Franklin D. Roosevelt Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America, do declare that said national emergency a threat to the security and personal safety of the people of our country due to the hoarding of ammunition and the use of high-capacity magazine designed to carry ammunition still continues to exist and pursuant to said section to do hereby prohibit the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates ammuniton and high-capacity magazines within the continental United States by individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations and hereby prescribe the following regulations for carrying out the purposes of the order:

Section 1. For the purpose of this regulation, the term ‘hoarding” means the withdrawal and withholding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates from the recognized and customary channels of trade. The term “person” means any individual, partnership, association or corporation.

Section 2. All persons are hereby required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, to a Federal Reserve bank February 1, 2013, to The Department of Homeland Security or a branch or agency thereof or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System all gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates ammuniton and high-capacity magazines now owned by them or coming into their ownership on or before April 28, 1933, except the following:

(a) Such amount of gold ammuniton as may be required for legitimate and customary use in industry, profession or art within a reasonable time, including gold prior to refining and stocks of gold in reasonable amounts for the
usual trade requirements of owners mining and refining such gold
, subject
to the limitation set forth in paragraph (b), following
.(b) Gold coin and gold certificates Ammunition in an amount not exceeding in the aggregate$100.00 twenty (20) rounds and belonging to any one person; and gold coins having recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins.

(c) Gold coin and bullion Ammunition earmarked or held in trust for a recognized foreign government or foreign central bank or the Bank for International Settlements. governmental entity.

(d) Gold coin and bullion Ammunition licensed for the other proper transactions (not involving hoarding) including gold coin and gold bullion ammunition imported for the re-export or held pending action on applications for export license.

Section 3. Until otherwise ordered any person becoming the owner of  gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates more than twenty (20) rounds of ammuniton or any high-capacity magazines after April 28, 1933 February 1, 2013, shall within three days after receipt thereof, deliver the same in the manner prescribed in Section 2; unless such gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates are ammuniton is held for any of the purposes specified in paragraphs (a),(b) or (c) of Section 2; or unless such gold coin, gold bullion ammuniton is held for purposes specified in paragraph (d) of Section 2 and the person holding it is, with respect to such gold coin, gold bullion ammuniton, a licensee or applicant for license pending action thereon.

Section 4. Upon receipt of gold coin, gold bullion, or gold certificates ammuniton or high-capacity magazines delivered to it in accordance with Section 2 or 3, the Federal reserve bank or member bank will pay thereof an equivalent fair-market amount of any other form of coin or currency coined or issued under the laws of the United States.

Section 5. Member banks A branch or agency of The Department of Homeland Security shall deliver all gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned or ammuniton or high-capacity magazines received by them (other than as exempted under the provisions of Section (2) to the Federal reserve banks The Department of Homeland Security of their respective districts and receive credit or payment thereof.

Section 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, out of the sum made available to the President by Section 501 of the Act of March 9, 1933, will in all proper cases pay the reasonable costs of transportation of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates delivered to a member bank or Federal reserve bank in accordance with Sections 2, 3, or 5 hereof, including the cost of insurance, protection, and such other incidental costs as may be necessary, upon production of satisfactory evidence of such costs. Voucher forms for this purpose may be procured from Federal reserve banks the Department of the Treasury.

Section 7. In cases where the delivery of gold coin, gold bullion, or gold certificates ammuniton or high-capacity magazines by the owners thereof within the time set forth above will involve extraordinary hardship or difficulty, the Secretary of the Treasury The Department of Homeland Security may, in his or her discretion, extend the time within which such delivery must be made. Applications for such extensions must be made in writing under oath; addressed to the Secretary of the Treasury The Department of Homeland Security and filed with a Federal reserve bank. Each applications must state the date to which the extension is desired, the amount and location of the gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates ammuniton or high-capacity magazines in respect of which such application is made and the facts showing extension to be necessary to avoid extraordinary hardship or difficulty.

Section 8. The Secretary of the Treasury The Department of Homeland Security is hereby authorized and empowered to issue such further regulations as he or she may deem necessary to carry the purposes of this order and to issue licenses thereunder, through such officers or agencies as he or she may designate, including licenses permitting the Federal reserve banks and member banks of the Federal Reserve System, in return for an equivalent amount of other coin, currency or credit, to deliver, earmark or hold in trust gold coin or bullion to or for persons showing the need for same for any of the purposes specified in paragraphs (a), (c), and (d) of Section 2 of these regulations.

Section 9. Whoever willfully violates any provision of this Executive Order or these regulation or of any rule, regulation or license issued there under may be fined not more than $10,000 $250,000, or, if a natural person may be imprisoned for not more than ten years or both; and any officer, director, or agent of any corporation who knowingly participates in any such violation may be punished by a like fine, imprisonment, or both.

This order and these regulations may be modified or but not revoked at any time.

/s/

Franklin D. Roosevelt Barack Hussein Obama

President of the United States of America

April 5, 1933 [TBD] January, 2013


If you’d like to see the original Executive Order my draft is based on, click here: “Executive Order 6102: The Gold Confiscation Act of April 5, 1933

*ie: Bathroom break.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in History, Not Surprisingly, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s Time to Control ALL “Assault Weapons”!

In the wake of the horrific tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut there’s been an almost constant barrage of news stories calling for tighter controls on the sale and use of “assault weapons”, along with their magazines and ammunition. Consequently, there’s been a wide gamut of responses, from citizens concerned about gun violence, politicians screaming for action, panic buying by 2nd Amendment advocates, the NRA, and at least one law-breaking journalist trying to make a statement. And by Tuesday, January 15, 2013 Vice President Joe Biden will present gun control recommendations to President Obama based on his conversations with survivors, gun control advocates, gun groups, and retailers.

Regardless of Joe Biden’s good intentions, the recommendations he’ll advance won’t be anywhere near enough to stop future gun violence – because his focus is too narrow. As long as Liberal Democrats want to take a step closer to the elimination of the US Constitution’s 2nd Amendment (from a practical, if not legal, standpoint), why not consider adding these potential assault weapons of opportunity to the list? (Added bonus: None of these “weapons” enjoy the protection of the 2nd Amendment!)

DeWALT D51321 Coil Nail Gun Nail Guns
If it can shoot a 2-inch nail almost 4 inches into solid concrete, imagine what it can do to somebody’s hand, face or other body part. Actually, why imagine when the government reports an average of 37,000 reported nail gun injuries per year from 2001-2005.
(Image: DeWALT Model D51321 Coil Nailer)

Captive Bolt Guns
During 2010, approx. 35 million cattle were killed by some means for food. Bolt guns use high-pressure air to shoot an attached, sliding steel rod into the brain to kill animals who are terminally ill, infectious, or consumed as food. The guns may be quick and humane, but why not employ even more humane methods, such as the one used in “Soylent Green”? Or, just force mandate everyone follow a vegetarian diet?
(Image: Accles & Shelvoke Model 4067-0027-.22 Cal. “Cash Special” Bolt Gun)
Accles & Shelvoke brand Captive Bolt Pistol

Hasbro's "Rampage" Nerf Blaster Nerf® Guns
Despite their use of a color scheme most people wouldn’t be caught dead in*, there’s probably still a one-in-a-trillion chance a law enforcement officer might mistake a Nerf gun for an actual firearm. The time to act is now!
(Image: Hasbro’s Nerf N-Strike Elite “Rampage” blaster.)

Potato Guns
Most kids will find this cute toy lots of fun…until someone puts an eye out! Let’s work together to change “It’s all fun until someone puts an eye out” to simply “It’s all fun” by taking these potentially dangerous weapons away from youngsters and teaching them how to make potato heads, potato clocks, or even potato gnocchi.
(Image: End of the Commons General Store, Mesopotamia OH)
Potato Gun Toy

Guns N' Roses: "Lies" Album Cover Guns N’ Roses
Possible hearing damage aside, guns fire bullets and roses have thorns! Besides, I’ve never been much of a “Guns N’ Roses” fan anyway: I even had to look up the proper spelling of their name. ‘Nuf Ced. (Image: Guns N’ Roses album “Lies”, from their official website)

Claw Hammers
Yes, I know they’re not guns, per se, but did you know more people were killed with ordinary claw hammers – you know, the kind found in a home or garage – than with so-called “assault rifles” during 2011? (It’s true: 496 vs. 323, reports the FBI) And once those Nail Guns are banned they’ll be plenty more of these potential killers simply hanging around!
(Image: Nupla 13 oz. Claw Hammer Model #17013 – one of 39 different ones available at The Home Depot)
Nupla 13 oz. Claw Hammer

Finger Gun with Scope Index Fingers
If you’ve got at least one hand with an opposable thumb then you’re already a implied threat to society! The only real policy decision lawmakers need to consider here is whether to amputate the thumb or index finger in order to eliminate this pervasive threat. But, like digital medical records, it sounds great in theory but may not work out in practice.
(Image: uniquedaily.com, as quoted by The Breda Fallacy)
Disclaimers:
Each product mentioned here is presumed to be in strict compliance with every applicable rule and regulation in force at the time of the product’s design, manufacture, marketing, and sale, and it’s the consumer’s responsibility to use them properly. And, any intellectual property associated with any product shown here is the acknowledged property of their respective holders.

Facetiousness on my part? Most certainly! And, it’s not a complete list.

While it’s easy and expedient to enact ever-tighter gun controls with the belief that violent crimes will subsequently drop, history teaches otherwise: Despite Chicago having the tightest gun laws in the country, over twice as many people have been killed by guns in Chicago than U.S. troops fighting in Afghanistan. Despite England’s ban on handguns in 1998, by 2008 handgun deaths doubled. And while the annual number of gun-related deaths in Japan can be counted on one hand, adopting Japan’s model in the USA would probably require the elimination of the Constitution’s 2nd and 4th Amendments.

Instead, let’s consider reducing the motivations for criminal use of guns in the first place by ensuring that only responsible people can obtain and use firearms, teaching kids to have a respect for and a healthy fear of firearms through education and training, better enforcement of existing gun laws, working to build a growing and successful private economy, and eliminating “class warfare” rhetoric.

*Oops..not the best choice of metaphor.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Environment, History, Media, Politics, Ramblings | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment