November’s Unemployment “Sadistics”

As usual, the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released it’s monthly Employment Situation Summary, and for November 2011 it reports:

“The unemployment rate fell by 0.4 percentage point [from 9.0]
to 8.6 percent in November, and nonfarm payroll employment rose by 120,000…”

While still high, at least the BLS didn’t use the word “unexpectedly” to describe it… a word permanently ensconced in the lexicon of the mainstream press whenever they’re talking about the job market.

For a President who promised to “…save or create 3.5 million jobs..” between February 2009 and February 2011 if Congress approved his massive stimulus package – thereby keeping unemployment below 8% – this came as good news he and the mainstream press were only too happy to trumpet.

However, every silver lining has a cloud: Despite Obama’s repeated pledge that “…I’m not going to rest…until everybody who’s looking for work can find a job…”, their official unemployment rate has remained above 8% for the past thirty-four months (yep, 34!)… that’s nearly three years!

Image - stimulusvsrecoveryoct20112
“Not enough shovels, maybe?
(Click image to enlarge, Click here to read more)”

And, it appears that “silver lining” might be infinitesimally thin…and not even precious to boot…especially when pondering the details:

  • The 120,000 new non-farm payroll jobs created either barely or doesn’t cover the 90,000 to 150,000 new jobs needed each and every month for people entering the workforce for the first time (depending on who you read).
  • The BLS reports that 315,000 workers left the Civilian Labor Force during November (154,198 minus 153,883, in thousands). Where did these people go? They’ve left the workforce by (a) retiring, (2) becoming a “discouraged worker”, or (sorry to say) (c) discovering the afterlife.
  • The “8.6%” official number is optimistic. Called the “U-3″, it’s only one of six (6) numbers used to measure the unemployment rate, and only counts “people unemployed 15 weeks or longer, job losers, and people completing temporary jobs”… Oh, and they still have to be collecting unemployment benefits.
  • The BLS “U-6″ number is a better (but still not complete) measure: That’s all “people unemployed 15 weeks or longer, job losers, and people completing temporary jobs, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.” BTW”: The phrase “marginally attached” are those workers available for work but have not found work during the past 12 months. For November, 2011, the U-6 number was 15.6%
  • Want more details? Then check out a far more complete list of sobering facts here.

With the average period of joblessness now at 40.9 weeks, it’s no wonder Mr. Obama has added a new unemployment tracking metric – those unemployed longer than two years but less than five years – although, if he starts right now and creates 245,000 250,000 254,000 261,200 new jobs per month for the next five years he won’t need this new measurement. Or, maybe he can just make stuff up as he goes along. Otherwise, it’s a cute ploy for him and his Socialist cronies to argue for another “jobs-producing” stimulus just in time for the 2012 Presidential Election cycle.

I have a suggestion: How about the Democrat Senate considering one of the seventeen jobs bills already passed by Republicans in the House?

“Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.‘ “
- Mark Twain, “Autobiography, Volume I”, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press 2010, p. 228. From: https://www.york.ac.uk/depts/maths/histstat/lies.htm

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Media, Not Surprisingly, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Holidays are a Time for Giving

Well, now that I’ve had my fill of turkey with all the trimmings, followed by, in order, leftover turkey, turkey sandwiches, turkey pot pie and turkey soup, it’s time to indulge in Christmas shopping, Christmas music, Christmas decorations, Christmas cookies, and, mercifully, Christmas eggnog.

To acknowledge the official start of December, and in the spirit of the holidays, I thought I’d provide a short list of gifts that I don’t want to receive under any circumstance I’m considering for my closest relatives and friends. No need to thank me if this helps with your  shopping during the “holidaze”… you’re very welcome!

My 2011 Holiday Gift Suggestions
DVD Rewinder - Image The DVD Rewinder
Avoid paying DVD rewind charges by using quantum mechanics to rewind your DVDs in nanoseconds. It’s strangely quarktastic!
Neo Socket w/ Box - Image Neo Socket
Improve your car’s gas mileage 0-30% by plugging this small electrolytic capacitor into your 12V cigarette lighter. The blue glow shows you that something’s actually glowing blue!
Pink Caddy w/ Car Lashes - Image Car Lashes
Women! Be the envy of your friends (and Tammy Faye Baker) by adding this hot fashion look to your vehicle’s headlights. Available for all makes and models.
Maga Power Insoles - Image Magna Power Insoles
Use the healing power of magnets to stimulate not only the nerve and capillary systems in your feet but also the security detection systems at most major airports.
Toshiba's "3D Monocle" - Image Toshiba’s 3D Monocle
Why suffer the inconvenience of large, bulky 3D glasses, or wait for glasses-free 3D televisions when you can now have the the most lifelike one-eyed 3D experience around?
Angry Nerds Front-Ender - Image Angry Nerds app
Eliminate those nasty software bugs by accurately catapulting angry Nerds into them. A variety of Nerds and bugs ensures minutes of fun for all ages!
De-3D Glasses - Image De-3D Glasses
Reduce annoying and inconvenient headaches, dizziness and nausea caused by action-packed 3D movies by converting 3D movies into regular 2D movies. (Note: Has no effect on bad plots, inane dialogs or movie theater food).
Tactical Balls- Image Tactical Balls
Although not what I thought, they’re a  simple and effective way to create confusion and disorientation in any unwanted or unruly crowds. They’re portable, battery operated and require no training: Ideal for law enforcement officers afflicted with taseritis and/or triggeritis.
Chia Obama - Image Chia Obama
Show your patriotic fervor while “going Green” at the same time: Just spread the green around, add some water, and watch it grow! A thoughtful and organic gift for the radical left-wing environmental moonbat in your family.
Bear Scratch
Can’t quite reach that pesky itch? Then get the Bear Scratch, and tame that itch the way wild bears do. “It’s better than bad, it’s good!”

(The Author acknowledges the various Copyrights and Trademarks used throughout this article are the property of their respective holders.)

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Are You Kidding me?, I'm Laughing! | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Happy! Happy! Toy! Toy!

Joe Eskenazi of the SF Weekly has been tracking efforts by San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors to ban McDonald’s Happy Meals from the city, and reports on November 29th that capitalism is still alive and well, even if bureaucratic common sense is not.

Thanks to Democrat Eric Mar’s valiant and unwavering efforts, the veto-proof, Democrat Board passed an ordinance that only allows a food establishment to include a free toy with a meal having:

  • less than 600 total calories
  • less than 640 mg sodium
  • less than 35% total calories from fat (excluding “natural” fats, like nuts, eggs, cheeses, etc)
  • less than 10% total calories from saturated fat (excluding “natural” fats, like nuts, eggs, cheeses, etc)
  • trans fat exceeding 0.5 grams
  • at least 0.5 cups or more of fruits or vegetables.

To get a free toy with purchase of a single food items or beverage,  the food or beverage must have less than 35% of total calories from fat and less than 10% of calories from added caloric sweeteners.

McDonalds’ clever solution? Instead of including that inexpensive (but cute!) toy in a meal for free, or selling the toy separately for a couple of bucks (actually, $2.49 at my local McDonalds), the toy can be purchased for just ten cents – but only after purchasing a Happy Meal!

So much for bureaucrats thinking things through.

Heck, McDonalds isn’t forcing anyone to buy their food, isn’t dictating how much food a person is required to eat, isn’t telling parents how to raise, feed and control their kids, and probably doesn’t believe that a toy can motivate every child to finish their food. Still, they aren’t completely blameless: I remember when a regular hamburger, regular fries, and a small drink were classified as “an adult size portion” – and the Big Mac was large by comparison. Today (except for that bottomless drink) they are some of the smallest items of their type on the menu.

In light of McDonalds’ business acumen, I’m guessing it facepalms all around for San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors – perhaps if they aren’t happy enough, I suggest they follow the lead of Ren and Stimpy.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s Valentine’s Day for the Red Sox

I read today that the Red Sox selected former New York Mets Manager Bobby Valentine as their new Manager, filling the job vacated by Terry Francona in September, 2011 following the worst late-season collapse in Red Sox history. (Don’t gloat, Yankees fans – you’ve got a far more impressive collapse of your own, as I recall).

Frankly, it’s about time, especially as my bill for the 2012 Season’s Tickets should arrive any day now and I want to make sure my money is well spent I can accurately estimate how much Pepcid AC® I need for consumption during the 7th inning stretch (Bobby Jenks as the setup man and Daniel Bard as closer? I can see Bard adequately settling in, but, frankly, from what I’ve seen Jenks can’t even throw an effective tantrum… sorry, once again, I digress…)

Now, I’m a big fan of Terry Francona, always have been: Some may argue, and I’d agree, that the 2004 Red Sox lineup was the product of Dan Duquette’s player selections… but Francona and his staff provided that amazing post season comeback. As for 2007, that was Francona’s and Theo Epstein’s leadership all the way.

I’m just a plain old Red Sox fan, but Bobby Valentine leaves me cold: He’s doesn’t use statistical analysis tools, his winning record is fairly unimpressive (.510 overall, .534 with the Mets), the only time he saw the Yankees in the post-season he lost in five games… and, he hasn’t managed since 2002, according to his current employer.

My pick would have been DeMarlo Hale: He already knows the Red Sox system. Rather than make the argument, I’ll let Francona do it for me (emphasis is mine):

“It’s the toughest market to be at third base and the toughest field and you never heard people talk about him so that was a huge compliment to him.  Part of the reason, a big reason you never heard about him, was because he did such a good job.” (source)

“I hope he gets serious consideration, if not here, somewhere else, because I think he’s a tremendous manager-in-waiting… He’ll manage somewhere, and he’ll be very good.” (source)

“I hope the way our season ended in Boston doesn’t hurt his chances, because this guy is as solid as they come.” (source)

I truly hope it wasn’t Francona’s ringing endorsements that prevented Hale from being selected, and, that Bobby Valentine can not only fill Francona’s shoes, but bring the Red Sox further while in them (I’m already busy enough bemoaning the players and umpires while at a game, I don’t need to add the manager as well!). And to the owners, not to worry: I’ll be sure to buy plenty of extra Pepcid AC® just in case your “Valentine” results in broken hearts.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Politics, Sports | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A FREE $500 Gift Card?!?

It appeared too good to be true, especially during the holiday season: Inside my “Men’s Interests” magazine was a prepaid five hundred dollar gift card, courtesy of Red Star World Wear, redeemable on their website for “…brand new cool Red Star products”. Hmmm… Why would a company I’ve never purchased anything from – heck, never even heard of – simply send me $500 of their merchandise for free?

My curiosity piqued, I visited their website and looked over their selection of “cool” sunglasses, watches, and (a few) sunglass cases. Some actually were “cool” indeed – time to use their extremely generous $500 Gift Card!

Well, here’s how their generosity works: Each item they offer has a “Proposed (retail) Price” (say, $210) and a lower “Gift Card Price” (say, $126). Order an item, and the “Gift Card Price” is deducted from the $500 Card. Order at least $450 of items (or, 4 or 5 max, based on their prices), and they’ll even throw in a free watch. Sounds pretty sweet!

All that they ask is a “Service Fee” of 9% of the retail price or $9.90, whichever is larger, on each item purchased, to cover “…1st Class postage, general overhead and profit, free exchange, and processing and handling services.” So, ordering 4 items plus one (1) free watch works out to be at least $49.50 in “Service” fees – a cost that, as they clearly state numerous times, includes their profit.

Now, I don’t mind a company making a fair profit – it’s the fuel that drives the engine of innovation and capitalism. However, it got me wondering: How much profit might they be making?

As an example, I compared a pair of Red Star’s “Prowl” sunglasses to the “closest” pair I could find on China’s official suppliers website (I say “closest” because I really didn’t have time to look through over 165,000 models of sunglasses available on their site), and came up with this fairly rough comparison:

Red Star World
Wear “Prowl (RS02A)
2011 Hot
Shipping Boxes Sunglasses
  • Blue frame, anti-fog, polarized, 8 layer hard finish, 100% UV/IR Protection
  • Price: 9% of $126 “Gift Card Price” = $11.34 actual price.
  • Blue, polarized, gradient lenses, TR90 frame, UV400 protection, CE & FDA Certified
  • Price: $1.50 to $3.00 wholesale price per pair (minimum order 300 pieces, FOB Shanghai, China)

Bottom line? Even acknowledging the fact that Red Star still has to pay shipping from Shanghai to (probably) California, and then overhead, handling, and shipping costs when the product is in the United States, they’re still (probably) making $30 profit on my $49.50… and maybe more, as they almost certainly bought more than 300 pairs of sunglasses.

Scam? Ripoff? Not at all. Red Star World Wear does offer some nice products that no doubt perform as advertised, and their profit margin doesn’t seem excessive. But I don’t know what’s worse: An unbelievable, over-the-top marketing pitch for what are probably average grade goods offered at a fair price… or the possibility that they may actually try to sell their goods at their “Proposed Prices”.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Are You Kidding me? | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What the CFL is Wrong with these Bulbs?!?

While working on my little 7″ netbook hackintosh I turned on my energy-efficient compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) only to discover it’s “6000 hour nominal life” CFL bulb failed after only about 27% of it’s rated life (let’s see: about 4 hrs average use per day, roughly 400 days… 1600 hours total use…yep, about 27%!)

The troubling part is that (a) I think only 3 of the couple dozen CFLs I’ve installed have lasted anywhere near their rated life, and (2) I’ve used them according to instructions (don’t touch the glass bulb when installing, don’t turn it off if you need it again within 15 minutes, don’t use it with dimmer switches, don’t install it in a moist environment, etc.) Fortunately, a CFL bulb only costs 4-6 times that of an ordinary incandescent bulb available 3-for-a-buck at the local dollar store. Gee, this “going green” sure is expensive!

Which reminds me: I read a few years back that a company (General Electric perhaps? Maybe not.) was working on a high-efficiency incandescent bulb whose filament was coated with a fine layer of ruby atoms: This increased the bulb’s efficiency to near that of a mercury-containing CFL bulb, while using no mercury at all. (BTW: If you have any information on this technology, kindly let me know.)

I was about to write “I digress”, but the mercury in that failed CFL bulb means I can’t simply toss it out – I have to put it into a sealed plastic bag first before gently placing it in the trash. I’m just glad I’ve never broken a CFL bulb – I’d rather have the EPA show up at the landfill containing a few million traces of toxic mercury, each in it’s own non-biodegradable plastic bag, than visit my house when I don’t follow their CFL hazardous waste cleanup procedure to the letter.

Thankfully, it’s just one light bulb out of hundreds of millions to be sold each and every year. I’m sure we need not worry about those lithium automobile batteries, old wind turbines, new wind turbines, innocent birds, or snail darters.

Update: Looks like incandescent bulbs might receive a Congressional reprieve, but, unlike Liberty and Peace, it may only be for 90-days. And, thanks to Dale’s “Out of Order” Blog for an excellent Daletoon involving CFL bulbs.

Update 01-03-13: Seems that touch of mercury in a CFL bulb might not be the only risk. A study by Stony Brook University in New York suggests that CFL bulb exposes you to high levels of of potentially cancer-causing ultraviolet radiation if the protective coating inside the bulb is cracked or incomplete: A condition they saw in every single bulb they tested!

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Are You Kidding me?, Environment, Not Surprisingly | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment